U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS,
SPRING 2011
FEDERALISM: DAY ONE
OSY chapter 3; Woll 11 (Bryce), 12 (McCulloch
v. Maryland), 13 (Gibbons v. Ogden)
Wednesday, February 23
main types
of powers – enumerated, implied, concurrent, reserve (police), denied; OSY p. 85
chart is a useful summary of how powers are distributed
key constitutional
provisions: necessary and proper clause (Article I, section 8; often called elastic
clause), supremacy clause (Article VI), Article IV (see next point), Tenth
Amendment
defining
relations among the states (sometimes called horizontal federalism) defined in Article IV:
full faith and credit clause, privileges and immunities clause, interstate
compacts
Why are these
clauses important for the average citizen?
Why are they useful
for states?
key historical developments:
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), Barron v. Baltimore (1833), dual
federalism, 16th (federal income tax) and 17th (direct
election of senators) Amendments, cooperative federalism (marble cake, not
layer cake), New Deal, New Federalism/Reagan Revolution, Devolution Revolution,
unfunded mandates, preemption, recent Supreme Court decisions limiting federal/congressional
powers over the states, progressive federalism
How does McCulloch v. Maryland establish national
supremacy?
Why is Gibbons v. Ogden important for understanding
federalism?
Why did the U.S. shift
to cooperative federalism in the 1930s?
How did President
Reagan change the debate about the federal government’s role with his New
Federalism in the 1980s?
positive aspects
of federalism: In Woll 11, James Bryce explains several advantages of federalism,
for the nation as a whole and for local and state governments.
Which condition
created by federalism (Bryce’s points 4 through 8) seem most important or
relevant for state/local governments, and why?
TYPES OF FEDERAL GRANTS-IN-AID
Most of
these grant types arise in the Cooperative Federalism period (post-New Deal);
this list expands slightly on OSY’s discussion of grants-in-aid
Categorical: specific $ amount, specific purpose (e.g. building
or other project, sometimes research); includes grants by Congress and by
federal agencies; can include some matching formula, e.g. the interstate
highways were funded as 90% federal with a 10% state match
Earmark: a categorical grant specified by a member of
Congress in a bill (one way to bring $ home to district); recently Congress has
reduced use of the earmark
Block grant: specific amount of $ given in broad categories,
few strings attached; gives states flexibility but the federal government still
dictates how much $ states receive; Reagan Administration
Revenue sharing: gives $ directly back to states, no strings;
introduced by President Nixon in early 1970s but ended in 1986; good for states
(some received more than others), no federal control over what states did with
the money; many states still practice revenue sharing with local governments
Which method(s) of
distributing money would states prefer and why?
Which method(s) would
Congress prefer and why?
Which method(s) would
Democrats generally prefer? Republicans? (and why?)
Unfunded mandate: No specific $ amount (and sometimes no $ at
all), forces states to comply with federal law or face penalties; often called
coercive federalism – speed limit, drinking age, drunk driving standard,
environment, homeland security
Why do unfunded
mandates drive the states crazy?
FEDERALISM IN ACTION: AN EXERCISE
To help reinforce knowledge of which level of government is
responsible for what activities within American federalism, determine for each
of these situations which level of government – federal or state/local –
has the power to deal with the situation, according to the Constitution’s
description of powers granted to the federal government, state governments, or
both. Ideally you should be able to make
specific reference to the Constitution and/or OSY chapter 3 to support each
answer.
We will discuss the answers in class, and a
summary of correct answers to these exercises will be posted to this handout on
the course website – click HERE for the answer
summary.
1. The date and voting procedures to be used for the City of St. Peter city council elections on September 13, 2011.
2. The right of a drug manufacturing company exclusively to sell a new drug to treat diabetes.
3. Correcting unsafe working conditions that endanger employee safety at a small, private liberal arts college somewhere in south central Minnesota.
4. Individuals trying to sell $500 Super Bowl tickets for $2,500 apiece (in other words, scalping tickets). Consider a) selling the tickets right outside the actual location of the Super Bowl, and b) selling the tickets via the Internet.
5. Banning guns from within 1,000 feet of all elementary and secondary school playgrounds in the United States.
6. Establishing a minimum price to be paid to producers of milk and other dairy products.