Go to: POL-110 home page ♦
Daily
Schedule page ♦ Writing style guide ♦
News
summary page ♦ POL-110-001 syllabus
POL-110-001 U.S. Government & Politics, Spring 2011
WOLL
Brief Summaries:
SCHEDULE
& INSTRUCTIONS
As your syllabus explains on pages 3-4,
the Peter Woll-edited book American Government: Readings and Cases contains numerous reading
selections – some old, some very recent – on U.S. government and politics. TWICE during the semester, you will be
responsible for presenting to the class a BRIEF (2-3 minutes) oral summary of one reading selection from the Woll book, and for handing in a 1-page written version of
your brief summary.
Your
summary is due in written form at the end of the class period when you
present. Papers should be no more than one typed, double-spaced piece
of paper. If you present but do not
have the written version completed, the paper loses 20 points (out of 100) and
could lose more if not turned in within 24 hours. Failure to present on your assigned date will
result in a 0 for this assignment.
You
get to choose the reading for both of your summaries, by telling me in class or
e-mailing me your choices. Sign-up for
all summaries should be completed by Tuesday,
February 15; this webpage will maintain a complete list of who presents
when.
Focus
on two tasks with each summary: 1) summarize
the reading’s main points – think carefully about what the reading is about and
pull out only the most important aspects to include in your summary; 2) relate the reading to the class’s main
topic – connect the reading to key points we’ve previously read about or
discussed, thus showing how this reading is relevant to the course.
Everyone is
responsible for reading these selections, not just the presenter. We are using these summaries to start a conversation about these
readings, not to be comprehensive in discussing all aspects of the readings.
EVALUATION
CRITERIA FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT: The main focus in grading you on
this assignment is the content of
what you say, which will carry far more weight than how well you present
(although you should speak clearly and get your points across to the class
effectively, too, without just reading your summary to us). I am looking for
evidence that you understand what you read and that you have been thoughtful
and diligent in connecting the reading to the main topic we are discussing. The
written summary will also be graded primarily for content, with less weight
given to writing quality. You do not need to provide a citation to the reading;
however, if you choose to quote something from the reading, the page number of
the quote should be included in the written synopsis.
READINGS,
DATES FOR PRESENTATIONS
Choose
the 2 readings you want and e-mail your choice to Chris;
preferences will be filled on a first-come,
first-served basis;
sign up should be completed by Tuesday,
February 15
LAST
UPDATED: Monday, February 21, 10:10 am
|
DATE |
Reading |
Topic
(read the book for details!) |
Presenter |
|
F February 18 |
6 |
National power over states |
Mark Petersen |
|
F February 18 |
7 |
Anti-Federalist arguments |
Rikka
Holiday |
|
F February 18 |
8 |
implied powers of federal government |
Kayla Joachim |
|
F February 18 |
9 |
Balancing state, federal power |
Rikka
Holiday |
|
F February 18 |
10 |
New Constitution as both federal and national |
|
|
|
|||
|
M February 21 |
4 (only #47 and #48) |
Constitutional structure |
|
|
M February 21 |
4 (only #51) |
Separation of powers |
Emily Papagapitos |
|
M February 21 |
31 |
Dealing with factions |
Nicole Raebel |
|
W February 23 |
11 |
Merits of federalism |
Matthias Aunes |
|
W February 23 |
12 |
Implied powers of Congress |
|
|
W February 23 |
13 |
Limits to federal power |
Kayla Joachim |
|
F February 25 |
15 |
State actions and federal
regulation |
|
|
F February 25 |
16 |
Federalism today |
Matthias Aunes |
|
M February 28 |
60 |
Theories of representation |
Casey Hagadorn |
|
M February 28 |
62 |
Congress, the electoral connection |
|
|
|
|||
|
W March 2 |
58 |
Congressional responsiveness to
public |
Kyle Radtke |
|
W March 2 |
59 |
Congress, members’ quest for power |
|
|
W March 2 |
61 |
Why voters like their own members
of Congress |
Caroline Nelson |
|
W March 2 |
63 |
Congress, members’ home style |
Anna Michel |
|
F March 4 |
46 |
Why the president should be one
person |
Nicole Raebel |
|
F March 4 |
47 |
Theories of the presidency |
Nicole Schwarz |
|
W March 9 |
48 |
Presidential leadership |
Anna Michel |
|
W March 9 |
49 |
Presidential power |
Dan Bradt |
|
W March 9 |
50 |
Presidential character |
Elizabeth Logas |
|
M March 14 |
54 |
Bureaucratic power |
Pete Lindquist |
|
M March 14 |
55 |
Rise of the federal bureaucracy |
Josh Peterson |
|
W March 16 |
65 |
Role of federal judiciary |
Nicole Schwarz |
|
W March 16 |
66 |
Marbury v. Madison, judicial review |
Sophia Ogren-Dehn |
|
F March 18 |
5 |
How to interpret the Constitution |
Kyle Radtke |
|
F March 18 |
67 |
Judicial self-restraint |
Pete Lindquist |
|
F March 18 |
70 |
How Supreme Court decides cases |
Sarah Krech |
|
F March 18 |
71 |
Death penalty interpretations |
Ida Vaisanen |
|
M March 21 |
14 |
Limits to federal power |
Mitch Nelson |
|
M March 21 |
53 |
Limits of presidential power |
Mitch Nelson |
|
M March 21 |
68 |
Courts and political questions, one
politician’s opinion |
|
|
M March 21 |
69 |
Courts and political questions,
the Supreme Court’s opinion |
|
|
|
|||
|
W March 23 |
18 |
Right to counsel |
Casey Hagadorn |
|
W March 23 |
19 |
Free speech limitations |
Caroline Nelson |
|
W March 23 |
20 |
Freedom of the press |
Sarah Krech |
|
W March 23 |
26 |
Establishment of religion, school
prayer |
Julia Lutz-Lawlor |
|
M April 4 |
27 |
Right to privacy |
Sarah Larson |
|
M April 4 |
28 |
Extensions of right to privacy |
Thomas Olsen |
|
M April 4 |
29 |
Roe v. Wade, abortion |
Mark Petersen |
|
M April 4 |
72 |
Justice O’Connor on constitutional
liberties, abortion rights |
Ida Vaisanen |
|
M April 4 |
73 |
Justice Rehnquist on liberty,
privacy, and abortion rights |
Sarah Larson |
|
M April 4 |
74 |
Justice Scalia on liberty and
abortion rights |
Julia Lutz-Lawlor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
W April 6 |
21 |
Separate but equal doctrine |
Nicole Haglund |
|
W April 6 |
22 |
Brown v. Board of Education,
overturning separate but equal |
Nicole Haglund |
|
W April 6 |
23 |
Brown II, how to implement
desegregation |
Emily Papagapitos |
|
F April 8 |
24 |
Right to vote |
Sophia Ogren-Dehn |
|
F April 8 |
30 |
Affirmative action |
Dan Bradt |
|
M April 18 |
Auletta article |
Obama White House & press |
Andrei Hahn |
|
W April 27 |
32 |
Political parties as organizing
forces in government |
|
|
W April 27 |
40 |
Dealing with special interests |
Thomas Olsen |
|
F April 29 |
33 |
Importance of discussion for govt. |
Josh Peterson |
|
F April 29 |
35 |
Divided government and parties |
Nick Nigro |
|
F April 29 |
43 |
The governmental process |
Stephen Leeb |
|
F April 29 |
44 |
Role of interest groups in govt. |
Stephen Leeb |
|
F April 29 |
34 |
Responsible parties |
KZ Eto |
|
W May 4 |
36 |
Critical elections |
Joey MacGibbon |
|
W May 4 |
37 |
Voting behavior |
Elizabeth Logas |
|
W May 4 |
38 |
Actions of the electorate |
KZ Eto |
|
F May 6 |
41 |
Campaign spending and the 1st
Amendment |
|
|
F May 6 |
42 |
Campaign finance reform |
|
|
F May 6 |
Pomper article |
2008 election analysis |
Joey MacGibbon |
|
W May 11 |
Health care article |
Health care reform |
Andrei Hahn |
|
W May 11 |
Page & Simmons article |
Is American public policy
effective? |
Nick Nigro |
|
|
|
|
|