POL 344, CRITICAL PRESIDENTIAL
ELECTIONS, FALL 2011
The 1912 FREE FOR ALL, DAY ONE
Questions for Chace,
Prologue and chapters 1-8
Additional reading assigned by Kyle
& Jacob: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/rockefellers/sfeature/sf_7.html
Wednesday, October 12
1. The office of President of the United States is one that,
by all accounts, William Howard Taft never really wanted. Woodrow Wilson on the other hand
clearly held presidential aspirations. Is a base level of ambition necessary for being
an effective candidate or President? How did their different attitudes towards the
office influence the presidencies of Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson?
2. TR's lifestyle does not
necessarily fit with what most think of when they think of members of the
Progressive Movement or Party, and typically in modern politics individuals want
candidates to have a similar lifestyle as they do. Do you take much stock in personal
lifestyle when voting? Do you believe that it is beneficial, or necessary, for an
official to look or act like their constituents?
(Descriptive Representatives)
3. What are some causes of the rift between Taft and
Roosevelt After sharing an intimate friendship and mutual respect for one
another politically, how did the campaign for nomination turn into a heated and contested campaign? Keep in
mind, Taft had been mentioned in the text to have wanted to be a part of the law
more than politics, what was the driving factor for him to seek re-election?
4. Roosevelt proposed a policy called "New Nationalism",
which involved placing “national needs above sectional or personal
advantage", creating the graduated income and inheritance tax, and various other acts and revisions placing
more power in the national government. Is this “New Nationalism" a template for
what would eventually become FDR's "New Deal"?
5. Was TR "duped" or was the Sherman Anti-Trust Act
violated by J.P Morgan and US Steel's actions with the Tennessee Coal Company?
How did that affect TR's feelings about the size of government and the way
trusts were to be governed?
6. Was abandoning and attacking the Republican Party the
right thing for TR to do, politically and/or personally? Why or why not? Is it
better to stand up for what you believe to be right, even if you have no chance
of winning, or to bide your time and wait for your turn to set things right?
7. Was Wilson a puppet of the New Jersey, and largely the
East coast, bosses? Or, did his speech to the Democratic delegates on September 15, in
Trenton, New Jersey, reveal his rousing of public conscience and his future campaign for
nomination to the presidency?
8. To what extent, as described in length in Chapter 5, did
big business lead to Taft’s inadequacies?
How might big business and Taft's actions against big business provide
the opportunity for Roosevelt to run for nomination for the presidency? Is
there a causation factor here?
9. The Democratic and Republican parties seemed to share many
of the same ideas in the 1912 election. In fact, some of the greatest disagreements were
between politicians belonging to the same parties. In what ways did Democrats and
Republicans (Socialists and Progressives) share the same vision? In what ways did
their views differ? What major candidate had the most unique ideas?
10. What are the political stances of all four candidates in
the 1912 election? Identify and describe the various groups of people
that supported each candidate and the strengths, weaknesses, triumphs and
failures of each candidate prior to the 1912 election.
11. The central question for the Republican Party in the
nomination battle is how to reconcile the traditional conservatism of the party with a
public desire for progressive ideals, and the inability to do so ultimately split the
party. Is this a question the Republican Party has ever found an answer to? As we move in
to the 2012 election season, is this a question that modern day Republicans are struggling
with?
12. Roosevelt's campaign was well funded but lacked the
organization that Taft had control of. Playing the guessing game, which we love to do, would the
outcome for TR been different if he didn't have to spend so much time focused on
Taft and could push his attention more towards Wilson?