Click on Reload to make sure you get a current copy and not an old cache.
Last updated 12/11/02 9:00 p.m.
MCS-221 Problem Assignments: Fall 2002
| Section
| Practice problems*
| Problems to turn in
| Due date
|
| 6.1
| 1, 5, 7, 10, 11
| 2, 8, 16
| T 12/3
|
| 6.1.1
| 1
| 6
| F 12/6
|
| 6.2
| 3, 5, 11, 13
| 6, 14 (Cayley-Hamilton theorem),
diagonalization diagram handout
| F 12/6
|
| 6.3
| 1, 3
| 2, 4, 6
*Extra credit: 8, 17, 18, 19
| T 12/10
|
| 6.4
| 1, 2, 3
|
|
|
| 6.5
| 2, 3, 9
|
|
|
* These are merely some suggested problems.
You should work as many problems as necessary to master the ideas.
Unless otherwise indicated, the problems are from our text,
Linear Algebra: Ideas and Applications, by Richard Penney.
Homework rules
- Acknowledge your sources (people and texts).
- In nontrivial problems, show how you get your answers.
- Turn in neat, well-written solutions, not messy first drafts.
Trim "fringes." Staple.
- Do not copy collaborative solutions; write up solutions in your own words.
- Turn in homework on time. Each class day late reduces the possible points
by 25%.
- Do extra credit problems entirely on your own.
Proof Portfolio (Perfect Proofs)
- Problem 1.1 #9
- Problem 1.2 #22
- Problem 2.2 #10
- Problem 3.3 #18
- Let V and W be vector spaces. Let T: V -> W be a linear transformation.
Let U be a subspace of V. Prove: (a) T(U) is a subspace of W;
(b) T-1({0}) is a subspace of V.
Do not assume that T is a matrix transformation.
- Problem 4.2 #12 (The reference should be to Exercise 10.)
Assume that the set S is nonempty.
- Problem 4.2 #13
- Problem 6.2 #14 (pre-Cayley-Hamilton Theorem)
Proofs
- Give a clear statement of the proposition to be proved.
- Proofs should be written in complete sentences. Mathematical
expressions should be embedded in a grammatically sensible way. Look
at your math texts to see how this is done.
- Every step in a proof is or can be justified by a reason.
Valid reasons include assumptions, definitions, and previously
established results, as well as principles of logic.
The extent to which reasons are omitted and
proofs abbreviated depends on the audience.
- Clearly define for the reader all variables and terms that you
introduce.
Make the "quantification"--whether "for all ..." or "there exists--of
variables clear.