ART102: Art History II
New Look at 'Mona
Lisa' Yields Some New Secrets
The New York Times. September 27, 2006
|
O |
TTAWA, Sept. 26ÑThe first major scientific analysis of the
''Mona Lisa'' in 50 years has uncovered some unexpected secrets, including
signs that Leonardo da Vinci changed his mind about his composition, French and
Canadian researchers said Tuesday.
Photographs taken with invisible infrared light and a special infrared camera suggest that at least one of the details was hiding in plain sight, the scientists and conservators said.
The
sitter in the Louvre Museum's 16th-century masterpiece, believed to be Lisa
Gherardini, the wife of a Florentine silk merchant, was originally painted
wearing a large transparent overdress made from gauze, they said. Under normal
light, part of the garment is visible on the right-hand side of the painting,
but appears simply to be part of the background.
''You
can see it when you know what you're looking for,'' said Bruno Mottin, a
curator in the research department of the Center of Research and Restoration of
the Museums of France, known as C2RMF. He spoke at a news conference with
researchers from the National Research Council of Canada.
Mr.
Mottin said such transparent robes were worn by expecting or nursing mothers in
16th-century Italy. The robe's reappearance in the ''Mona Lisa'' would dovetail
with scholarly research indicating that the painting might have been
commissioned to commemorate the birth of Lisa Gherardini's third child.
The
imaging also shows, although less clearly, that some of the sitter's hair was
rolled into a small bun and tucked under a tiny bonnet with an attached veil.
(The images are too cloudy to be reproduced on newsprint.)
''That
is not surprising,'' Mr. Mottin said. ''The bonnet was usually worn by women in
the 16th century.''
More
generally, the researchers said they realized that centuries of grime had
obscured some elements of the painting.
''You're
seeing a lot more fine detail, showing that this remarkable painting is
actually more remarkable than we believed,'' said John M. Taylor, an imaging
scientist and conservator with the National Research Council of Canada.
Mr.
Mottin said that two pieces of clothing had faded from view, largely because of
the application of now-discolored layers of lacquer over the centuries.
While
the ''Mona Lisa'' has become famous for the sitter's calm, some say enigmatic,
smile, it appears that the composition was not always so restful. For example,
the new images show that at one point one of her hands was painted in a
clenched rather than a relaxed position.
''It
was as if she was going to get up from a chair,'' Mr. Mottin said of the
version Leonardo ultimately changed.
David
Rosand, a Renaissance art historian at Columbia University, said it was not
surprising that the ''Mona Lisa'' contained hidden secrets. ''This is a
painting that has never been cleaned, that is remarkably dirty,'' he said.
''This is exactly what one would expect.''
For
security and conservation reasons, scholars have rarely been able to view the
painting other than through heavy glass, the researchers noted.
Indeed,
Mr. Mottin, whose laboratory is within the Louvre palace complex, said that the
''Mona Lisa'' last received a complete examination after being vandalized in
1956.
Among
other cutting-edge technologies, the scientists used a newly developed Canadian
laser camera to construct an extremely detailed three-dimensional model of the
painting.
It
reveals that while the ''Mona Lisa'' may be old and dirty, it is not, as had
long been thought, particularly fragile.
''We
have a good handle on the physical state of the painting,'' Mr. Taylor said.
While the wood panel on which it is painted is quite warped at points, he said,
the 3-D model shows that it is sound and that the paint remains well bonded to
its surface.
The
3-D scanner is a variation on equipment used by American astronauts earlier
this month to check the space shuttle for damage before it returned to Earth.
The Canadian research council, which has worked with museums around the world
since the 1980's and with the French for a decade, developed a model able to
resolve fine details in artworks at the limit of known optical technologies.
The
pictures it produced, during two scanning sessions in 2004 when the Louvre was
closed in the evening, are so detailed that special monitors had to be created
to view them.
Researchers
hope that their newfound ability to measure and reproduce fine detail will
allow conservators and art historians to settle longstanding debates about
Leonardo's sfumato painting technique, which resulted in a painting with no
obvious brush strokes.
Mr.
Taylor said the scan showed, as expected, that the ''Mona Lisa'' had been
created by using many extremely thin layers of paint.
Mr.
Mottin said many scholars believed that Leonardo first executed the light
portions of his painting and then gradually built up the dark areas.
A
computer-generated relief map of the painting made with the scanned data shows
that, in fact, the dark areas around the sitter's mouth and eyes have the
thickest layers of paint. Yet other dark areas are comparatively thin.
Over
time, Mr. Mottin said, he hopes that the detailed digital image will help yield
even more specific information.
''What
I'd still like to know is really how the painting was done,'' he said.
Many
of the researchers' findings and images are reported in a book by Jean-Pierre
Mohen, Mr. Mottin and Michel Menu that has just been published by Harry N.
Abrams, ''Mona Lisa: Inside the Painting.''