ART 102: ART HISTORY
2
Viewing Assignment IV
Citizen Kane
Due: Wednesday, April 18, 2007
In contemporary
culture filmmaking is a popular form of art. Film makers in this country and
abroad have been effective in studying art images of western and non-western
art and in transferring the effective powers of traditional images into moving
images of film.
Orson Welles was
one of the most admired filmmakers in America. Even today, the power of his
films is unsurpassed. His most famous and controversial film is Citizen Kane. The film is loosely based on the life
of Randolph Hearst, a newspaper publisher. Contemporaries so feared the
screenplay of Citizen Kane,
that no studio would back this film. As a result, Welles (at this point hardly
30 years old) financed, produced, distributed, and also starred in this movie.
While watching Citizen
Kane, analyze the movie
in terms of the visual techniques used by Welles. Note that Welles was
sophisticated in his adaptation of formal devices and formal elements from
history.
Choose one
moment created by Orson Wells that utilizes Baroque visual devices.
Some things to
consider are the effects of composition, lighting, vantage point, and use of
mirrors. Compare this moment with Baroque art. Have both artists (Welles and the
Baroque artists) used the visual device for the same purpose? How does this
visual device direct their viewers or influence the expression of content?
The introduction
to Baroque in Stokstad, will help you in better understanding these elements.
Some Baroque examples that will aid in your interpretation of the elements are:
Caravaggio,
Entombment
Caravaggio, Calling of St. Matthew
Georges de la Tour, Magdalen with
Smoking Flame
Gentileschi, Judith and Maidservant
with Head of Holofernes
Zurbaran, Saint Serapion
Velazquez, Water Carrier
Rubens, Raising of the Cross
Rubens, Landscape with Rainbow
No more than one
page will be accepted.
Analyzing Artworks
Description
Make objective or value-neutral statements about the work in
question. Exclude interpretations and evaluations, and instead take an
objective inventory of the work. Point out single features such as objects,
trees, and people. Then point out abstract elements such as shapes and colors.
Finally point out textures, which can lead to a description of the
"characteristics of execution."
A test of objectivity would be
that most people would agree with your statement.
Make statements about the relations among the things you
named in the descriptions. When you are studying a pair of images you should
study similarities in formal elements--such things as color, shape, or
direction. Then note dissimilarities (contrasts) in those same elements. Take
note of continuities (such as the color red repeated throughout the work) and
of connections (for example, the shape of a window repeated in the shape of a
table) between these formal elements and the subject matter. Finally, note the
overall qualities of the work.
Make statements about the
meaning(s) of the work. This is the most creative part of your critique. Using
a hypothesis, support it with arguments, based on evidence given in the
Description and Formal Analysis.
This is the most complex part of
the critique and requires an opinion regarding the worth of an object, based on
what was learned in the previous stages of the critique. Are you moved by this
work? What do you think of it?
Orson
Wells Is Dead at 70; Innovator of Film and Stage
New York Times, October
11, 1985
|
O |
rson
Welles, the Hollywood ''boy wonder'' who created the film classic ''Citizen
Kane,'' scared tens of thousands of Americans with a realistic radio report of
a Martian invasion of New Jersey and changed the face of film and theater with
his daring new ideas, died yesterday in Los Angeles, apparently of a heart
attack. He was 70 years old and lived in Las Vegas, Nev.
An assistant coroner in Los Angeles, Donald Messerle, said
Welles's death ''appears to be natural in origin.'' He had been under treatment
for diabetes as well as a heart ailment, his physician reported. Welles's body
was found by his chauffeur.
Despite the feeling of many that his careerÑwhich evoked almost
constant controversy over its 50 yearsÑwas one of largely unfulfilled promise,
Welles eventually won the respect of his colleagues. He received the Lifetime
Achievement Award of the American Film Institute in 1975, and last year the
Directors Guild of America gave him its highest honor, the D. W. Griffith
Award.
His unorthodox casting and staging for the theater gave new
meaning to the classics and to contemporary works. As the ''Wonder Boy'' of
Broadway in the 1930's, he set the stage on its ear with a ''Julius Caesar''
set in Fascist Italy, an all-black ''Macbeth'' and his presentation of Marc
Blitzstein's ''Cradle Will Rock.'' His Mercury Theater of the Air set new
standards for radio drama, and in one performance panicked thousands across the
nation.
In film, his innovations in deep-focus technology and his use of
theater estheticsÑlong takes without close-ups, making the viewer's eye search
the screen as if it were a stageÑcreated a new vocabulary for the cinema.
By age 24, he was already being described by the press as a
has-beenÑa cliche that would dog him all his life. But at that very moment
Welles was creating ''Citizen Kane,'' generally considered one of the best
motion pictures ever made. This scenario was repeated several times. His second
film, ''The Magnificent Ambersons,'' was poorly received, but is now also
regarded as a classic, although the distributors re-edited it and Welles never
liked the result. ''Falstaff'' and ''Touch of Evil,'' two of his later films,
were also changed by others before their release.
For his failure to realize his dreams, Welles blamed his critics
and the financiers of Hollywood. Others blamed what they described as his
erratic, egotistical, self-indulgent and self-destructive temperament. But in
the end, few denied his genius.
He was a Falstaffian figure, 6 feet 2 inches tall, weighing well
over 200 pounds, with a huge appetite for good food and drink and large cigars.
Loud, brash, amusing and insufferable by turns, he made friends and enemies by
the score.
His life was a series of adventures whose details are fuzzy, in
part because he was a bit of a fabulist, delighting in pulling the legs of
listeners, in part because the credit for his achievements is the subject of
fierce controversy.
George Orson Welles was born in Kenosha, Wis., on May 6, 1915,
the son of Richard Head Welles, an inventor and manufacturer, and of the former
Beatrice Ives. His mother was dedicated to the theater, and Welles said he made
his debut at 2 as the child of ''Madame Butterfly'' in an opera performance.
According to ''Orson Welles,'' an authorized biography by
Barbara Leaming published a few weeks ago, Welles's genius was discovered when
he was only 18 months old, not by a Broadway producer or agent but by his
doctor, Maurice Bernstein, who, pronouncing the child a prodigy, began to
furnish him with a long series of educational gifts. These included a violin,
painting supplies, a magic kit, theatrical makeup kits and even a conductor's
baton.
His parents were divorced; Mrs. Welles died when he was 6, and
he spent several years traveling around the world with his father, a bon
vivant.
At 10, he entered the Todd School in Woodstock, Ill. His five
years there were his only formal education.
Under the guidance of Roger Hill, the headmaster, young Orson
steeped himself in student theater, staging and acting in a series of
Shakespeare productions. Together, he and Mr. Hill edited ''Everybody's
Shakespeare,'' a text for school productions, which sold well for many years.
On his graduation, he took a brief course in painting at the
Chicago Art Institute, then sailed for Ireland on a sketching tour. There,
smoking a cigar to disguise the fact that he was only 16, he managed to
convince the Gate Theater in Dublin that he was a Theater Guild actor on a
holiday.
He went on as the Duke in ''Jew Suss,'' followed it with other
featured parts and even achieved a featured role at the eminent Abbey Theater,
all in his first professional season. Then, after a spell of travel in Spain
and Morocco, he returned to Chicago.
Through Thornton Wilder and Alexander Woollcott, Welles was
introduced to Katharine Cornell, who engaged him for supporting roles in a tour
that included ''Candida,'' ''Romeo and Juliet'' and ''The Barretts of Wimpole
Street.'' When Miss Cornell opened ''Romeo and Juliet'' on Broadway on Dec. 20,
1934, Welles played Tybalt. He was then 19 years old.
Like everything else he did, Welles's acting was a subject of
controversy. Some critics would always accuse him of hamming, of hogging the
limelightÑespecially when he was also the director. But many professionals and
a large public found his presence electrifying. ''He has the manner of a giant
with the look of a child,'' said Jean Cocteau, ''a lazy activeness, a mad
wisdom, a solitude encompassing the world.''
Early in his Broadway career, Welles picked up supplementary
income as a radio actor. He became familiar to millions as the sepulchral voice
of ''The Shadow,'' a wizard who turned virtually invisible to foil criminals.
But he kept up with the theater; in 1935 he was engaged by the
producer-director John Houseman to star in Archibald MacLeish's poetic drama of
the Depression, ''Panic,'' in which he portrayed a tycoon.
To combat unemployment, the Roosevelt Administration had set up
the Works Progress Administration, one of the many projects of which was the
Federal Theater. With Mr. Houseman as manager and Welles as director, it
mounted several striking productionsÑthe black ''Macbeth,'' a starkly austere
''Dr. Faustus,'' a comic ''Horse Eats Hat''Ñthat excited the theater world.
Even more than some other
W.P.A. projects, the Federal Theater also stirred conservative wrath. The last
straw came when a troupe featuring Howard da Silva and Will Geer prepared to
stage ''The Cradle Will Rock,'' a leftist musical by Marc Blitzstein, in 1937.
The authorities banned the production and locked the company out
of the theater on opening night. Welles joined the cast and an audience of
2,000 in a march up Sixth Avenue to a rented theater. To evade the ban, the
actors sang from seats in the auditorium, with Mr. Blitzstein conducting from a
piano on stage.
The Federal Theater soon was liquidated, but Welles and Mr.
Houseman went on to found the Mercury Theater. Its first production in late
1937, a ''Julius Caesar'' in modern dress with overtones of Fascist Italy, was
a smash hit. The Mercury took in the production of ''The Cradle Will Rock''
that had been banned by Government authorities; it had success also with
''Shoemaker's Holiday'' and ''Heartbreak House.''
Chiefly to provide its actors with steady income, the company
signed up with CBS Radio as the Mercury Theater of the Air. Its acting,
dramatic tension and inventive use of sound effects set new highs in radio
theater.
On Oct. 30, 1938, the Mercury Theater of the Air presented a
dramatization of H. G. Wells's ''War of the Worlds,'' in the form of news
bulletins and field reporting from the scene of a supposed Martian invasion of
New Jersey. It was an event unique in broadcast history, frequently recalled in
books, magazine articles and repeat performances.
Many thousands of listeners tuned in after the introduction, heard
the music interrupted by flash bulletins and panicked. Some armed themselves
and prepared to fight the invaders; many more seized a few belongings and fled
for the hills. Police switchboards around the country were flooded with calls.
Welles was already famous; a few weeks earlier, at age 23, he
had appeared on the cover of Time magazine as the ''Wonder Boy'' of the
theater. Now he was suddenly a household wordÑthe target of some indignation,
but also of amused admiration.
The Mercury Theater on Broadway was nevertheless a financial
failure, and ended its theatrical existence in early 1939. The following season
the company, including such relatively unknown actors as Agnes Moorehead,
Joseph Cotten and Everett Sloane, went to Hollywood under a contract with
R.K.O. that granted Welles total artistic freedom.
On his first visit to a film studio, Welles is said to have
marveled, ''This is the biggest electric-train set any boy ever had.'' The
movie community, however, was not entranced by the unconventional young
interloper.
A Saturday Evening Post profile in 1940 reflected this view.
''Orson was an old war horse in the infant prodigy line by the time he was
10,'' it said. ''He had already seen eight years' service as a child genius.
Some see the 24-year-old boy of today as a mere shadow of the 2-year-old man
they used to know.''
Welles was then directing ''Citizen Kane,'' based on a scenario
by Herman J. Mankiewicz, with himself in the title role. An impressionistic
biography of a newspaper publisher strongly suggestive of William Randolph
Hearst, it is now fabled for its use of flashback, deep-focus photography, sets
with ceilings, striking camera angles and imaginative sound and cutting.
Kenneth Tynan has written, ''Nobody who saw 'Citizen Kane' at an
impressionable age will ever forget the experience; overnight, the American
cinema had acquired an adult vocabulary, a dictionary instead of a phrase book
for illiterates.'' Stanley Kauffmann called it ''the best serious picture ever
made in this country.''
The making of ''Kane'' has
been the subject of fierce polemics. Pauline Kael, in a famous New Yorker
article in 1971, called it a ''shallow masterpiece'' and ''comic-strip
tragic,'' and accused Welles of trying to deny credit to Mr. Mankiewicz, Mr.
Houseman and the cameraman, Gregg Toland. This has been rebutted in part by Mr.
HousemanÑwho said he had been the pupil and Welles the teacher in stage
creation - and in great detail by many Welles admirers, notably the director
Peter Bogdanovich.
It turned out that Miss Kael had not sought to question Welles.
His defenders concede that he had thrown violent tantrums, leading to the
departure of Mr. Houseman, but say he was frequently generous in praise of his
collaborators.
More seriously, the Hearst newspaper chain was accused of
seeking to block the showing of ''Kane'' and it long barred mention of Welles
and his film in its publications. ''Citizen Kane'' could neither be reviewed
nor advertised in its newspapers. An offer was made to pay R.K.O. what it had
cost to make the picture plus a modest profitÑwell below $1 million in allÑto
destroy all prints of the film.
This was refused. But ''Kane'' drew a mixed reception when it
opened in 1941, and it was years before it turned into a profit maker. Welles
won an Academy Award for writing the film, and was nominated for directing and
acting awards.
Meanwhile, Welles was making Mercury's second movie, ''The
Magnificent Ambersons.'' At the close of shooting, Welles acceded to a request
by Washington that he fly to Rio de Janeiro to make a good-neighborly
documentary on the Mardi Gras. On his return, he found that an impatient R.K.O.
had done the final cutting of ''The Magnificent Ambersons.''
He was deeply hurt, and he disowned the film. On the movie
company's side, the assertion was made that Welles was impossible to deal with
on content, and unreliable on costs and completion dates. This perception,
encouraged by some journalists, made it forever afterward difficult for Welles
to obtain financing for his projects.
Welles and his supporters retorted that his budgets were always
low, sometimes remarkably so, and that his shooting schedules were sometimes
extaordinarily tight. Some concede that, never satisfied with his work, he had
an almost neurotic reluctance to view it when done, and several uncompleted
works remain in storage.
After ''The Magnificent Ambersons,'' the tireless Welles
returned to Broadway in 1941 to direct a dramatization of Richard Wright's
''Native Son,'' which was a triumph; did a series of wartime propaganda
broadcasts for the Government; produced and acted in the movie thriller
''Journey Into Fear'' (1942), which was a failure, and starred as Mr. Rochester
in the highly popular ''Jane Eyre'' (1943).
Rejected by the Army because of flat feet, he took part as a
magicianÑanother of his talentsÑin a tour of the European Theater of
Operations, in which his act was sawing Marlene Dietrich in half. Back home
after the war, he adapted and staged a Cole Porter musical version of ''Around
the World in 80 Days'' in 1946 that was praised by critics but failed at the
box office. He lost $350,000 of his own money in the production.
He also directed and acted in a Hollywood spy thriller, ''The
Stranger,'' in 1946, and produced, directed and co-starred with Rita Hayworth
in ''The Lady From Shanghai,'' in 1948.
He and Miss Hayworth, who
were married in 1943, were divorced in 1948. They had a daughter, Rebecca.
Welles had a son, Christopher, from his first marriage, to Virginia Nicholson,
which also ended in divorce. In 1955, he married the Italian actress Paola
Mori, who appeared with him in his ''Mr. Arkadin.'' They have a daughter,
Beatrice.
In part because of his losses from ''Around the World,'' which
were ruled nondeductible for tax purposes, Welles moved to Europe, where he
lived most often in Spain, for many years. From time to time, he would act in a
film or television show or in television commercialsÑhe was always in demand as
a performerÑand from time to time would use his earnings and what financing he
could raise to make a picture, or part of one. His acting talents enhanced such
filmsÑmade by other directorsÑas ''Tomorrow Is Forever,'' ''The Third Man,''
''Compulsion,'' ''A Man for All Seasons'' and ''Catch-22.''
In Italy and Morocco, at intervals from 1949 to 1952, he put
together and starred in ''Othello'' and ''Macbeth.'' The latter film, shot in
three weeks, has been violently criticized. In Mexico and Paris, beginning in
1955, he filmed the not yet completed ''Don Quixote.'' In four European
countries in 1954, he made ''Mr. Arkadin,'' based on a thriller he had written
himself.
In Paris and Zagreb, Yugoslavia, in 1962, he wrote, directed and
acted in ''The Trial,'' based on the Kafka novel. Many critics decry it; some
call it a masterpiece. He completed two other films in Europe and, in 1970,
began a major project, ''The Other Side of the Wind,'' which remains
unfinished. His last directorial effort to be released was ''The Immortal
Story'' in 1968; he also performed in it.
In 1958, Welles returned briefly to Hollywood to act with
Charlton Heston in ''Touch of Evil.'' At Mr. Heston's suggestion, Welles was
enlisted as director as well. Some admirers consider it one of his best films,
and its opening scene, coming to a climax in a car explosion, is a model of the
genre, although Welles was to complain that it, too, had been re-edited by the
studio without his permission.
He also staged, and appeared in, a successful run of ''Othello''
in London, and was featured in dozens of television shows.
He refused to appear on Broadway, however, after an unfortunate
appearance in ''King Lear'' during which, having broken an ankle, he acted in a
wheelchair. He vowed that he would never return to the New York stage while
Walter Kerr was still a critic there. Writing for The New York Herald Tribune,
Mr. Kerr had described Welles as ''a buffoon,'' ''an actor without talent'' and
''an international joke, possibly the world's youngest has-been.''
Mr. Kerr was not the only hostile critic. In 1963 Stanley
Kauffmann, although more admiring of Welles's virtuosity, also accused him of
overacting and concluded, ''After 'Kane,' his film directing consists of
sometimes glittering, often wild attempts to recapture that first fine careful
rapture.''
That was the common reception given in this country to Welles's
film ''Falstaff,'' which had been hailed in Europe under the title ''Chimes at
Midnight.'' When it appeared here in 1967, a number of critics panned it, one
calling Welles ''inarticulate'' and saying he made Falstaff ''a sort of Jackie
Gleason.''
More recently, however, The Times's Vincent Canby wrote that the
picture ''may be the greatest Shakespearean film ever made.''
The film and television writer Stephen Farber commented:
''Looking back over American movie historyÑa history of wrecked careersÑyou
begin to see that the critics have a lot to answer for. The classic victim is
Orson Welles.''
This was, of course, also Welles's view. He complained, ''They
don't review my workÑthey review me.'' It cannot be doubted that his flamboyant
personality, his enormous early success, his pride and his lofty aspirations
caused critics to measure him against standards they might not have applied to
a more modest film maker.
He was the legendary sort of figure upon whom old anecdotes are
rehung. Mr. Mankiewicz, for example, was reported by Miss Kael to have said of
Welles, ''There, but for the grace of God, goes God.''
Welles inspired harsh criticism, yet most people felt that even
his most unsuccessful, most self-indulgent works all had some feature, some
turn that was memorable. There were no dissenters when, at the dedication of a
Theater Hall of Fame in New York 1n 1972, his name was among the first to be
chosen.
He is survived by his wife and three children.
Wells:
touch of Genius
By: Vincent Canby
New York Times, October
11, 1985
|
''T |
he
Magnificent Ambersons'' was not Orson Welles's first film, but it was the first
Welles film I ever saw and it, as well as ''Citizen Kane,'' forever changed the
way I - and millions of other people around the worldÑlooked at movies.
It also changed our expectations of them. I was 18 at the time
and, in common with most Americans who had come of age after the advent of
talkies, I had no idea that movies could look and sound like this.
Here was a film that seemed to be from another medium, if not
another planet. Welles was not the first film maker to employ deep-focus
photography (by which actors in the background are as clearly seen as those
close to the camera), high-contrast black-and-white film stock, and long takes
that allowed actors to build drama within a single scene.
However, the way he used them was revolutionary in itself, and
made possible a revolutionary kind of film, one that didn't deal in
pre-conditioned responses but invited complex and sometimes contradictory
responses.
In ''The Magnificent Ambersons,'' Welles seemed to have found a
way of combining the possibilities of cinema with the more formal demands of
the theater to create something entirely new. Among other things, he allowed
his movie audiencesÑlike those in the so-called living theaterÑto choose what
they would look at in almost any scene. He didn't coerce audiences with
close-ups. In this fashion, he liberated the screen.
It was a shock yesterday to realize that Welles was only 70 when
he died, but then he had begun making films early, at 25, and he was the first
major film maker to have been born after movies had been invented. He was thus
the first major film maker to work within the heritage established by the men
who did the inventingÑGriffith, Murnau, von Stroheim and Ford. Before he made
''Citizen Kane,'' he is said to have looked at John Ford's ''Stagecoach''
several dozen times. Welles was able to study films. With him, movies can be
said to have come of age.
Not all of Welles's films were equally great, but ''Citizen
Kane,'' ''The Magnificent Ambersons,'' ''The Lady from Shanghai'' and ''Touch
of Evil,'' the last he was to make in this country, establish him without
question as the premier American film director of his generation. Much has been
made of his problems with Hollywood, the furor over ''Kane,'' his terrible
treatment at the hands of the money men, but I suspect now that these
difficulties were somehow built into his personality.
Like many brilliant men, he thrived on controversy and easily
grew restless. It's true that his reputation for being difficult didn't endear
him to the Hollywood establishment, but if the establishment hadn't dropped
him, he certainly would have dropped it.
Another thing that interfered with his career as a film maker
was his popularity as an actor. He originally said that he took roles in
second-rate movies to pay for the films he wanted to direct. This money also
allowed him to live well, which he enjoyed as much as making movies, so that
finally he didn't make, or even finish, all of the films he intended. It was
once said of him that he left bits and pieces of unfinished films around Europe
the way traveling salesmen leave laundry in hotel rooms.
In addition to being an artist, Welles was also something of a
con artist. Not for nothing was one of his last films, ''F for Fake'' (1973),
an amused, often sarcastic commentary on the modern art scene with emphasis on
successful art forgers. Welles was a genius, but he was also a master magician.
Though he had been inactive as a director for some years before his death, his
fame remains as undiminished as his reputation.
Probably, more people got to know him through his appearances in
television commercials than ever saw his films. In this profitable as well as
witty way, he kept himself in the public eye even though his days of great
productivity were over.
His epitaph is spoken in ''Touch of Evil'' by Marlene Dietrich:
''He was some kind of man.'' The line was written by Welles himself.