|
Phil on Hol Goes Corporate
'zine expects to reap significant tax
benefit
(Vol. VI, No. 1 -- Spring 2003)
Peg "Call Me EnPeg" O’Connor writes:
In a world of corporate mergers and consolidations,
small businesses need as many breaks
as they
can get. To help small business stay
competitive
in the 1980s, small business owners
were
given some tax incentives. One such
provision
allowed business owners to deduct up
to $25,000
of the purchase cost of automotive
vehicles
weighing more than 6,000 pounds used
for
commercial purposes. The contractor
who needed
a large pickup or the owner of a small
furniture
company could take the deduction and
thus
be better able to make capital expenditures.
The 6,000-pound restriction made sense,
given
that the average weight of automobiles
in
the 1980s was much less than that.
Welcome to the crowded road world of the
SUVs. The roads are full with Dodge
Durangos,
Ford Excursions and Expeditions, and
Chevy/GMC
Suburbans and Yukons. These are all
weighty
vehicles, in terms of tonnage and price.
They easily exceed that 6,000 limit
and so
they are subject to the deduction when
used
for commercial purposes. And as the
weight
of these SUVs has grown, so too has
deduction.
The tax package recently signed by
President
Bush increased the deduction to $75,000.
And while some contractors and other
small
business owners who haul goods benefit
from
this increased deduction, so too do
a host
of other business owners. Your local
doctors,
accountants, and lawyers can also pilot
these
vehicular behemoths, and enjoy the
hefty
deduction.
Increasing the deduction when so many new
vehicles weigh more than 6,000 pounds
helps
to ensure that small business owners
will
go for bigger and pricier vehicles
since
they can deduct so much of the cost.
Why
purchase a smaller lighter vehicle
and not
be able to deduct when you can purchase
a
heavier model and take a big deduction?
A
smart accountant who drives his SUV
to his
meeting with you would advise you to
buy
the heavier vehicle since you can deduct.
In light of these tax incentives, the editors
of Philosophers on Holiday have been doing a little SUV shopping on
the Internet. We are prepared to incorporate
ourselves (see photo below of our new Board of Directors
during recent shareholders' meeting; note
bags of cash) as a business and reap these vehicular rewards.
We are particularly interested in the 2003
HumVee Hummer H1, listed for $105,000. We
are drawn to this model because of its features,
including the duel (sic) gas tanks with a
combined capacity of forty two gallons. (We
are a bit concerned that Hum Vee dealers
give no gas mileage figures, but we understand
that the point of SUVs is to use more gas.)
Given our passion for the great outdoors,
we are very enamored with the Deep Water
Fording Capability. This capability perhaps
helps to explain why each Hummer H1 comes
with its own On Board air compressor. And
we know that we will save some money by not
having to renew our AAA membership, since
the Hummer H1 has the Run Flat Tire System.
We have been eyeing some of the accessories
that HumVee offers. We are weighing
the pros
and cons of the roof racks that hold
up to
2,000 pounds (a small car). The custom
racks
hold some appeal for us so that we
could
drive our All Terrain Vehicle onto
our Sport
Utility Vehicle.
Of course, we are law-abiding citizens who
would use this vehicle for business
purposes
only. We do haul a fair amount of high
tech
camera equipment (disposable camera
with
flash) in addition to our editorial
and production
machinery (laptops and a printer).
But we
have also been keeping our eye on the
Supreme
Court, and if the Supremes decide that
a
corporation is a person and has the
right
to free speech, then personal/commercial
distinction is just a dot in the rear
view
mirror of the Hummer H1.
|