|
Vummanhood(Vol. IV, No. 1 -- Summer 2000)Brita DeRemee’s introductory essay on "Vummanhood" (Vol. III, No.4) prompted two readers to respond. First this response from Purdue University philosopher Charlene Haddock Seigfried. To Staff Vumman, Brita DeRemee: I propose as the philosophical locus classicus for vummanhood, the following passage from William James. It is part of a letter sent to his wife after traveling in—where else?—Germany. Like the original coinage, it comes from a man, and like any classical text, it needs updating—but it has the essentials of self-respect and power stirred into a mash of self-sacrifice.
I wonder what Alice dear thought of the compliment! Better yet, it would be fun to imagine what the other Alice in his life—his sister, with her acerbic wit—would have made of it. Cordially, Charlene Haddock Seigfried And a second response from Patrick McCormack of New Brighton, MN (and bro-in-law of Brita) My initial reaction to Brita DeRemee’s article on vummunhood was to ponder the gender question. Is there a male cognate? Is there a manly apposite to a vummun? How about a Mennan? The ice blue? A man with fat triceps wearing a wife beater? He drives a Ford pickup, scratches his ass in public, and wears cheap cologne on dates. His idea of cuisine runs from beans to weiners and back again. He calls forth vummunhood by his lack of involvement in child rearing... he roughhouses the kids and heads off to bowl. She shakes the flour off her apron, and squeezes her fat arms around the kids for a quick hug before doing the laundry. They live in a trailer. I was sniggering my way through these witless caricatures when I tumbled onto something. There is real substance to the entire question of vummunhood. Start with Alisdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue, pages 59-61. MacIntyre outlines how the Enlightenment destroyed rational discussions of ethics by destroying the concept of a person-as-they-should-be. Ethical principles are merely guideposts to direct you to become the good man or woman. Destroy the concept of a good man or woman, and ethics are arbitrary personal preferences. In this light, when John Wayne says, a man’s gotta do what a man’s gotta do, he is really saying that there is somewhere out there a debatable concept of a good man, and in that light, a man has to do what a good man has to do, to become a good man. And a good woman has to do what a good vummun has to do, in order to be a good vummun. So, the entire concept of vummunhood is an attempt to restore a discussable image of what a good woman is.... a specific sub-species, the mother of children. Doughty. A bulwark. A whirling combination of hard work, wit, discipline, and commitment. This is not a concept against feminism, it is a flavor of what it means to be an independent woman -- A feminist with kids and a tincture of selflessness. One who does what is necessary, because the vummun is able to see what is crucial, and do it because it has to be done. So a vummun does not exist except as a process towards a set of goals..... the vummun is a creature of motion, and snapshots look like caricatures because they flatten the dialectic of a woman in the midst of the whirl of change that is a family. Instead of chopping logic at the entire concept of vummunhood, the legitimate critic would offer instead a different image of what a woman should be.... If not a vummun, what? I need to rotate the tires on my old pickup, and my ass itches, so I will leave off on this essay. Onward, vummunhood! |
| Barb's Briefs | Contests | Creative Hearing | Feature Articles | Hometown Tourist | Pantheon Gastronomique | Songs | Sports | Travel Notes | Where Are They Now? | Wilkerson's World |